Answer #64
Three possible hands are given for South but only one is consistent with bidding. Which one? What should the other hands have bid? Neither side is vulnerable
North |
|
East |
|
South |
|
West |
--
Pass |
|
1♠
Pass |
|
Dbl
Dbl |
|
2 ♠ |
Hand a) |
♠ 2
♥ A Q J 3
♦ A K 10 6 2
♣ K 6 3 |
|
Hand b) |
♠ 6 2
♥ A Q J 4 2
♦ K J 2
♣ A Q 2 |
|
Hand c) |
♠ A Q J
♥ A J 3
♦ A K 9 2
♣ Q 8 2 |
Answer:
(a) is correct.
-
Both your doubles are for takeout, the second essentially saying, “Partner, West’s 2♠ bid let you off the hook, but now I’m forcing you to speak.”
-
Hand (a) is perfect – and note it’s much better to make the two doubles than bid the five-card minor at either opportunity – you have a three-suited hand.
-
With Hand (b), you’re better off bidding 2♥ over 1♠, to show your good five-card major; if the bidding then proceeds 2♠-P-P to you, you should reopen with a take-out double.
-
Hand (c) is a hand too strong to bid 1NT over 1♠ (you could have bid 2NT over 1♠, but that is more usefully played as Unusual, showing 5-5 in the two lowest unbid suits). You were therefore correct to double the first time, but should bid 2NT the second time, showing a hand too strong to have bid 1NT over 1♠ ie about 19-21 points.
Please click here to return to question